id int64 1 6.5k | bug_id int64 2.03k 426k | summary stringlengths 9 251 | description stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | report_time stringlengths 19 19 | report_timestamp int64 1B 1.39B | status stringclasses 6
values | commit stringlengths 7 9 | commit_timestamp int64 1B 1.39B | files stringlengths 25 32.8k | project_name stringclasses 6
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
401 | 84,260 | Bug 84260 import static fails when importing a method | I got the following error: ============================================== MyClass2.java:3 [error] The import MyClass.myMethod cannot be resolved import static MyClass.myMethod; ============================================== other import static statements (Strings/Enums) appear to work. | 2005-02-02 14:23:31 | 1,107,370,000 | resolved fixed | f747b82 | 1,118,230,000 | tests/bugs150/pr84260/A.java tests/bugs150/pr84260/I1.java tests/bugs150/pr84260/I2.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | AspectJ |
402 | 98,646 | Bug 98646 parser cannot parse varargs correctly | the following cannot be parsed: call(* *(int, Integer...)) see in modules/weaver/.../PointcutVisitorTest (uncomment the testTemp()) See "FIXME AV for Adrian" comments in PatternParser. Half fix but then fails for other tests. Adrian can you have a look at it ? Thanks | 2005-06-07 05:55:18 | 1,118,140,000 | resolved fixed | 743566f | 1,118,150,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/BasicTokenSource.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/PatternParser.java weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/VisitorTestCase.java | AspectJ |
403 | 94,167 | Bug 94167 NPE in reflect implementation | Proposed fix (I'd like input on how to best add test cases for this so I can submit a tested patch); I believe this will work because if you uncomment the work-around line, it works): Change line 63 from: method = declaringType.getDeclaredMethod (getName(),getParameterTypes()); to method = getDeclaringType().getDeclare... | 2005-05-09 13:37:42 | 1,115,660,000 | resolved fixed | 3824b1c | 1,118,150,000 | runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/AdviceSignatureImpl.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/MethodSignatureImpl.java tests/bugs150/PR94167.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | AspectJ |
404 | 81,846 | Bug 81846 EclipseAdapterUtils.java:83 | java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3 Unfortunately I can't provide much more information, please see the attached compiler dump. | 2004-12-23 07:27:36 | 1,103,800,000 | resolved fixed | a675b65 | 1,117,640,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/EclipseAdapterUtils.java | AspectJ |
405 | 96,371 | Bug 96371 Patch to support loading aop.xml properly | AspectJ 5 load-time weaving in CVS HEAD isn't loading aop.xml files properly from a jar file without specifying the global -D flag. The following patch fixes the problem for me so I can load aop.xml files from jars on the classpath without a global flag: ClassLoaderWeavingAdaptor.java:109: - Enumeration xmls = loader.g... | 2005-05-23 17:22:52 | 1,116,880,000 | resolved fixed | f14646f | 1,117,450,000 | loadtime/src/org/aspectj/weaver/loadtime/ClassLoaderWeavingAdaptor.java loadtime5/java5-src/org/aspectj/weaver/loadtime/ClassPreProcessorAgentAdapter.java tests/java5/ataspectj/ataspectj/SingletonAspectBindingsTest.java | AspectJ |
406 | 94,086 | Bug 94086 Exploding compile time with if() statements in pointcut | Compile time explodes when adding if(...) statements to pointcuts. This is the same with ajc 1.2.1 and 1.5M2 although 1.5M2 is a little bit faster, but compile time still explodes. Example: pointcut pc2() : (execution(* Test.a(..)) && if(sl.isEnabled()) ) || (execution(* Test.a(..)) && if(sl.isEnabled()) ) compiled in ... | 2005-05-09 04:45:22 | 1,115,630,000 | resolved fixed | 88d477d | 1,116,240,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/IfPointcut.java | AspectJ |
407 | 84,312 | Bug 84312 Finish implementation of *runtime* retention checking | See FIXME in BindingAnnotationTypePattern.resolveBinding() and EclipseSourceType.getAnnotationTypes() | 2005-02-03 05:47:10 | 1,107,430,000 | resolved fixed | f9eebd4 | 1,115,900,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/EclipseSourceType.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/BindingAnnotationTypePattern.java | AspectJ |
408 | 86,832 | Bug 86832 Internal compiler error (generics?) | Attached is project that will generate an "Internal compiler error" for a single class that extends "ArrayList<Object>". If the class extends just "ArrayList" the compiler error does not occur. Note that the "extends ArrayList<Object>" class compiles successuflly without the aspectj nature. --- exception --- Severity D... | 2005-02-28 09:59:49 | 1,109,600,000 | resolved fixed | 0cb826c | 1,115,890,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | AspectJ |
409 | 82,755 | Bug 82755 [ajdoc] update ajdoc to support Java 5 language features | Java 5 langauge features such as enums and annotations need to be supported by ajdoc. | 2005-01-13 10:49:15 | 1,105,630,000 | resolved fixed | 7b7c7b2 | 1,115,880,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Declaration.java ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/StubFileGenerator.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AsmHierarchyBuilder.java | AspectJ |
410 | 93,345 | Bug 93345 unresolved joinpoint in cflow causes ClassCastException on BcelWeaver:933 | I'm getting ClassCastException while compiling following code: ---- Test.java ---- class AClass { // void method() {} } aspect AnAspect { pointcut annt() : cflow( execution(* *(..)) ); before() : annt() { System.out.println("before annt"); } } ---- Here's output of the compiler: --- out --- java.lang.ClassCastException... | 2005-04-30 08:49:47 | 1,114,870,000 | resolved fixed | f603458 | 1,115,640,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AllTestsAspectJ150.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/StaticImports.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/SuppressedWarnings.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelWeaver.java | AspectJ |
411 | 87,282 | Bug 87282 Compilation error on generic member introduction | The compiler aborts with the following introduction code: aspect introductionToA{ private ArrayList<B> A.m_Array = new ArrayList<B>(); public void A.addB(B tmp){ m_Array.add(tmp); } } The error message is "[error] The method add(E) in the type ArrayList<E> is not applicable for the arguments (B) m_Array.add(tmp)" Compi... | 2005-03-07 11:27:29 | 1,110,210,000 | resolved fixed | 51c018d | 1,115,390,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/GenericsTests.java | AspectJ |
412 | 91,053 | Bug 91053 Generics problem with Set - does not compile with AspectJ 5 | I tried different things to remove compiler warnings about generics which you get when you switch to JDK 5 and use collections. At last I fall back to JDK 1.4. The following code compiles with AspectJ 5 and JDK compliance level 1.4: public aspect SubjectAspect { private Set Subject.observers = new HashSet(); public voi... | 2005-04-11 17:15:13 | 1,113,250,000 | resolved fixed | 952dda9 | 1,115,390,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/EclipseFactory.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/GenericsTests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeX.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java | AspectJ |
413 | 91,267 | Bug 91267 NPE at EclipseFactory.java:143 when using generic methods in aspects | When I compile any of these two aspects with ajc -1.5, an exception is thrown by the compiler: import java.util.*; public aspect TestBug1 { static <T> void addToEnv(Map<String,T> env, String key, T value) { env.put(key, value); } } import java.util.*; public aspect TestBug2 { static <T> T lookupEnv(Map<String,T> env, S... | 2005-04-13 09:29:09 | 1,113,400,000 | resolved fixed | 7389d9f | 1,115,370,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/EclipseFactory.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/GenericsTests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeX.java | AspectJ |
414 | 91,719 | Bug 91719 Work with Oli B to pull in examples of generating all the LINT messages | null | 2005-04-18 05:21:33 | 1,113,820,000 | resolved fixed | 70b9ffd | 1,115,220,000 | tests/bugs/seven/lint/Main.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/xlint/XLintTests.java | AspectJ |
415 | 92,906 | Bug 92906 showWeaveInfo for declare annotations | declaring annotations (declare @type, @constructor, @method and @field) currently doesn't show a message when the -showWeaveInfo option is set in ajc. Appropriate messages should be displayed. | 2005-04-27 09:55:33 | 1,114,610,000 | resolved fixed | abc9a58 | 1,115,200,000 | ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/ShowWeaveMessagesTestCase.java bridge/src/org/aspectj/bridge/WeaveMessage.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelClassWeaver.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelWeaver.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/Utility.java | AspectJ |
416 | 92,630 | Bug 92630 Null Pointer Exception thrown by ajc compiler | null | 2005-04-25 15:26:05 | 1,114,460,000 | resolved fixed | 02f75ba | 1,114,530,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/UnwovenClassFile.java | AspectJ |
417 | 91,912 | Bug 91912 Request for a new type of relationship in the structure model | Declare soft relationships are currently 'advises' and 'advised by' relationships. Would it be possible to add 'softens' and 'softened by' (or 'softens exception at' and 'exception softened by') relationships to the structure model? | 2005-04-19 11:32:29 | 1,113,920,000 | resolved fixed | 7a61380 | 1,114,100,000 | asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/IRelationship.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/AsmRelationshipProvider.java | AspectJ |
418 | 92,053 | Bug 92053 @args causes a VerifyError: Unable to pop operand off an empty stack | I'm getting a VerifyError exception when I try to use @args in following code: ------------------ Test3.java ------------------------- import java.lang.annotation.*; @Target(ElementType.TYPE) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @interface Ann {} @Ann class AClass{} public class Test3 { void abc(AClass y) {} public stat... | 2005-04-20 07:19:59 | 1,114,000,000 | resolved fixed | 3f942a4 | 1,114,010,000 | tests/java5/annotations/binding/bugs/Test3.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AnnotationBinding.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ArgsAnnotationPointcut.java | AspectJ |
419 | 91,858 | Bug 91858 NullPointerException when declare @type is spelt with capital letter | I have the following code in an AspectJ project: declare @Type: MainClass : @MyAnnotation; I believe the correct syntax should be: declare @type: MainClass : @MyAnnotation; However when I saved my aspect with the first version I got the following NullPointerException: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.aspectj.ajdt.... | 2005-04-19 05:38:48 | 1,113,900,000 | resolved fixed | 78abc76 | 1,114,000,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/DeclareAnnotationDeclaration.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/DeclareAnnotationTests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/PatternParser.java | AspectJ |
420 | 82,171 | Bug 82171 enable ASM interoperability with JavaCore via uniform element handles | null | 2005-01-04 14:13:17 | 1,104,870,000 | resolved fixed | df7fff4 | 1,113,500,000 | asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/AsmManager.java asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/IElementHandleProvider.java asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/internal/AspectJElementHierarchy.java asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/internal/FullPathHandleProvider.java asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/internal/ProgramElement.java docs/sandbox/api-clients/org/aspectj/samples/AsmRela... | AspectJ |
421 | 90,588 | Bug 90588 compiler verifyerror and an NPE | null | 2005-04-07 06:32:11 | 1,112,870,000 | resolved fixed | d697649 | 1,113,400,000 | tests/bugs150/pr90588/AbstractClass.java tests/bugs150/pr90588/ConcreteClass.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/knownfailures/KnownfailuresTests.java | AspectJ |
422 | 85,297 | Bug 85297 Improvements to incremental compilation | null | 2005-02-15 12:31:18 | 1,108,490,000 | resolved fixed | e460b1e | 1,112,710,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjState.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/IStateListener.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/IncrementalTests.java | AspectJ |
423 | 88,862 | Bug 88862 Declare annotation on ITDs | I'll use this bug to capture info on the implementation... | 2005-03-23 09:47:03 | 1,111,590,000 | resolved fixed | 0d14ccf | 1,111,610,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AnnotationBinding.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Annotations.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/NewFieldTypeMunger.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedMember.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelClassWeaver.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelS... | AspectJ |
424 | 84,333 | Bug 84333 BCException: Bad type name: TypeX.nameToSignature(TypeX.java:635) | null | 2005-02-03 10:14:20 | 1,107,440,000 | resolved fixed | fb01cad | 1,111,610,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/EclipseFactory.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/GenericsTests.java | AspectJ |
425 | 84,122 | Bug 84122 Allow aspectPath to contain directories | The -aspectpath option to the compiler only allows jar/zip files, not directories. But inpath and classpath allow directories. This capability would improve the handling of aspects spanning multiple projects in Eclipse. AJDT can currently only support jar/zip files on the aspect path, which requires one of the projects... | 2005-02-01 05:03:27 | 1,107,250,000 | resolved fixed | 68f6350 | 1,111,600,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjState.java tests/options/aspectpath/MyClass.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelWeaver.java | AspectJ |
426 | 76,055 | Bug 76055 Some Pointcut PatternNodes are missing getters to traverse syntax tree | In order to find out which other pointcuts are referenced by a pointcut definition i need to access the private members of the CflowPointcut, IfPointcut and NotPointcut PatternNodes found in the weaver module. Unlike the OrPointcut and AndPointcut classes, they are missing the appropriate getter methods. | 2004-10-12 03:43:52 | 1,097,570,000 | resolved fixed | b0f270e | 1,111,590,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/CflowPointcut.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/IfPointcut.java | AspectJ |
427 | 88,652 | Bug 88652 an array type as the last parameter in a signature does not match on the varargs declared method | I get this warning in my code, though I actually do not specify an array type. The signature I want to match is the following constructor signature: public Touple(Object formulaHandle, Object... propositions) {...} Touple implements IRelation The pointcut I use is the following: pointcut p(): call(Touple.new(..)); This... | 2005-03-21 12:05:42 | 1,111,420,000 | resolved fixed | b5f4d09 | 1,111,500,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ExactTypePattern.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/SignaturePattern.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/TypePattern.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/WildTypePattern.java | AspectJ |
428 | 87,376 | Bug 87376 NPE when unresolved type of a bound var in a pointcut expression (EclipseFactory.java:224) | see attached mini-project to reproduce | 2005-03-08 10:11:13 | 1,110,290,000 | resolved fixed | 85aa152 | 1,110,460,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AsmHierarchyBuilder.java tests/bugs150/pr87376/I.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | AspectJ |
429 | 86,789 | Bug 86789 annotations and "circularity in declare precedence" | null | 2005-02-27 16:24:12 | 1,109,540,000 | resolved fixed | f90186c | 1,110,380,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/WildTypePattern.java | AspectJ |
430 | 83,565 | Bug 83565 BCException "bad type name" thrown when compiling | I just downloaded AJDT version 1.2.0.20050124144759 and I am running Eclipse 3.1M4. I tried to use aspectJ on an existing Java 5 project. There are no aspects in it yet, just straight Java 5. The project runs just fine as a standard Java project. When add the AspectJ nature and I try to compile the project, no class fi... | 2005-01-24 17:13:15 | 1,106,600,000 | resolved fixed | 5765d53 | 1,106,850,000 | ajde/testdata/bug-83565/Bug.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/AjdeTests.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/GenericsTest.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AsmHierarchyBuilder.java | AspectJ |
431 | 83,626 | Bug 83626 @AJ | Andy wants a patch format + a bugzilla for @AJ work due to some funny license issue. Here it is as drafted | 2005-01-25 11:20:09 | 1,106,670,000 | resolved fixed | 7b4c7d7 | 1,106,750,000 | bcel-builder/src/org/aspectj/apache/bcel/generic/MethodGen.java | AspectJ |
432 | 83,563 | Bug 83563 pertypewithin() handing of inner classes | null | 2005-01-24 14:59:36 | 1,106,600,000 | resolved fixed | 1b01255 | 1,106,680,000 | tests/bugs150/PR83563_1.java tests/bugs150/PR83563_2.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150TestsNoHarness.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/PerTypeWithin.java | AspectJ |
433 | 83,303 | Bug 83303 complier error when mixing inheritance, overriding and polymorphism | Given this scenario: - class A define method m1 (with proteceted visibility) - class B extends class A and implements interface I and override method m1 (but with public visibility) - interface I define method m1 (with public visibility) The code is correct and compile using java 1.4 Let's modify the scenario: move the... | 2005-01-20 08:47:23 | 1,106,230,000 | resolved fixed | 5d281fd | 1,106,230,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/problem/AjProblemReporter.java tests/bugs150/PR83303.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150TestsNoHarness.java | AspectJ |
434 | 82,340 | Bug 82340 Visibility selector ignored for pointcuts | Using ajdoc under AJDT 1.1.12 or AspectJ 1.2.1 at the commandline has the following aspect has problems. public abstract aspect Aspect { private pointcut privatePointcut (); protected pointcut protectedPointcut (); public pointcut publicPointcut (); private void privateMethod () { } public void protectedMethod () { } p... | 2005-01-06 12:25:09 | 1,105,030,000 | resolved fixed | b460597 | 1,105,630,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/HtmlDecorator.java ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/StubFileGenerator.java ajdoc/testdata/bug82340/Pointcuts.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/foo/NoMembers.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/PointcutVisibilityTest.java | AspectJ |
435 | 82,218 | Bug 82218 fails to doc spacewar using AJDT 1.2.0M2 | Using AJDT 1.2.0M2 {with Java 5 JRE on XP SP2}, install Spacewar example and generate to Spacewar/docs. Result: output has no cross-references (and displays special AJDT tags), and stderr lists this exception: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.in... | 2005-01-05 04:49:41 | 1,104,920,000 | resolved fixed | f70b383 | 1,105,590,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/HtmlDecorator.java ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Util.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/foo/ModelCoverage.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/foo/NoMembers.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/JDKVersionTest.java | AspectJ |
436 | 78,021 | Bug 78021 Injecting exception into while loop with break statement causes catch block to be ignored | In order to test exception scenarios in an existing framework, I have created an aspect to inject an exception. The exception is injected into some code running within a try/catch/finally block. After the exception is thrown, I am expecting control to pass to the catch block. However, what is happening is that the catc... | 2004-11-06 13:47:16 | 1,099,770,000 | resolved fixed | 603b063 | 1,105,440,000 | tests/bugs150/PR78021.java tests/bugs150/PR79554.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/AllTests.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150TestsNoHarness.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AllTestsAspectJ150.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AllTestsJava5_binaryWeaving.java tests/src/org/as... | AspectJ |
437 | 82,134 | Bug 82134 AspectJ 5 M2 should implement backwards compatibility for binary aspect form | null | 2005-01-04 09:40:55 | 1,104,850,000 | resolved fixed | 797b6a6 | 1,105,110,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AllTestsJava5_binaryWeaving.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/MigrationTests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/AdviceKind.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/AjAttribute.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedPointcutDefinition.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Ve... | AspectJ |
438 | 81,863 | Bug 81863 Annotation matching using within() PCD doesn't appear to be working. | null | 2004-12-23 10:54:16 | 1,103,820,000 | resolved fixed | 8a8930f | 1,104,940,000 | tests/java5/annotations/within/PlainWithin.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AnnotationPointcutsTests.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/AnnotationRuntimeTests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/AnnotationTypePattern.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ExactAnnotationTypePattern.ja... | AspectJ |
439 | 82,062 | Bug 82062 WeaveMessage should provide more information | It would be wonderful if the WeaveMessage object would provide two additional things: - the affected class name - the aspect name I could use this to determine which aspect is woven into which class during load-time weaving (need this for dependency management). | 2005-01-01 15:07:54 | 1,104,610,000 | resolved fixed | 9897659 | 1,104,840,000 | bridge/src/org/aspectj/bridge/WeaveMessage.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Advice.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Shadow.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelTypeMunger.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelWorld.java | AspectJ |
440 | 80,916 | Bug 80916 In some cases the structure model doesn't contain the "matches declare" relationship | With a project containing one class and one aspect: public class HelloClass { public static void main(String[] args) { new HelloClass().sayHello(); } public void sayHello() { System.out.println("Hello"); } } public aspect A1 { pointcut test() : get(* System.out); declare warning : test() && !within(A1) : "test warning"... | 2004-12-14 06:01:38 | 1,103,020,000 | resolved fixed | 427c0d3 | 1,103,550,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/AsmRelationshipProvider.java | AspectJ |
441 | 80,249 | Bug 80249 Order of types passed to compiler determines weaving behavior | Currently, the order in which you specify types when passing them to the compiler can affect how they are woven: For example, if we have class A and class B extends A - Also, an aspect that 'declare parents: A+ implements Serializable' then depending on whether we see A first, we may or may not make B serializable. The... | 2004-12-06 05:20:15 | 1,102,330,000 | resolved fixed | 9052d5d | 1,102,330,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/AjLookupEnvironment.java tests/decp/A.java tests/decp/AspectX.java tests/decp/B.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | AspectJ |
442 | 77,163 | Bug 77163 Load time weaver default verbose setting | The default setting for the load time weaver is (as of 1.2.1rc1) to produce weaving messages rather than ignore them. I think the default should be changed to ignore them. Also, I cannot override the default setting with -Daj.weaver.versose="False". This is the implied syntax from docs/examples/build.xml. If this has c... | 2004-10-27 20:09:52 | 1,098,920,000 | resolved fixed | edd6539 | 1,099,650,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/tools/WeavingAdaptor.java weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/WeavingURLClassLoaderTest.java | AspectJ |
443 | 77,799 | Bug 77799 NullPointerException in StructureSearchManager | Calling Ajde.getDefault().getStructureSearchManager().findMatches(...) for an AspectJ project that has not been built results in a NullPointerException in StructureSearchManager.findMatchesHelper(...) (line 58) Simple patch is attached. | 2004-11-04 01:48:22 | 1,099,550,000 | resolved fixed | aab9c2c | 1,099,580,000 | ajde/src/org/aspectj/ajde/ui/StructureSearchManager.java | AspectJ |
444 | 76,798 | Bug 76798 Add versions to woven class files - enabling better backwards compatibility. | We don't currently include a version in the class files that come out of the weaver. This can cause problems. For example, if we add a new attribute to a class file in a future version of AspectJ, then that attribute will cause older versions of AspectJ to blow up if they encounter it. If we include a version in the cl... | 2004-10-22 07:04:41 | 1,098,440,000 | resolved fixed | 6aa7516 | 1,098,440,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/AjAttribute.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelAttributes.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelField.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelMethod.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelObjectType.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/LazyClassGen.java weaver/sr... | AspectJ |
445 | 73,895 | Bug 73895 unnecessary cast causing problems | class: org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedTypeX$Name method: isCoerceableFrom(..) I am having trouble with the line: ResolvedMember[] b = ((Name)other).getDeclaredMethods(); //??? is this cast always safe As the comment suggests this cast is NOT always safe. In my case the cast is not safe because I have some additional implem... | 2004-09-14 13:08:41 | 1,095,180,000 | resolved fixed | 8a64fa2 | 1,098,370,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedTypeX.java | AspectJ |
446 | 74,952 | Bug 74952 before,after !(cflow(within(Trace*))) prints nothing | Reference: "cflow(within(C)) vs (within(C)||cflowbelow(within(C)) in aspectj-users mailing list. The aspect TraceClass below doesn't print any message when the pointcut is defined to "!cflow(within(Trace*))". The other defintion "!(within(Trace*) || cflowbelow(within(Trace*)))" works fine. Wes Isberg in his reply expla... | 2004-09-24 11:04:58 | 1,096,040,000 | resolved fixed | a303a09 | 1,098,360,000 | tests/bugs/WhatsGoingOn.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelShadow.java | AspectJ |
447 | 76,096 | Bug 76096 Anonymous classes unaware of introductions into abstract classes (error can't find type $Local$) | null | 2004-10-12 12:17:35 | 1,097,600,000 | resolved fixed | 6beb43f | 1,098,180,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/problem/AjProblemReporter.java tests/bugs/pr76096/ConcreteClassA.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
448 | 75,568 | Bug 75568 ajc changes classfile timestamps even if compilation fails (regression) | It appears that ajc 1.2 updates a classfile timestamps even if the compilation fails. This breaks the integration with the Ant build system. E.g. using the ant "javac" task with the Ajc11CompilerAdapter interface, the compilation may fail on the first attempt and succeed on the second attempt, - because ajc has touched... | 2004-10-04 10:12:39 | 1,096,900,000 | resolved fixed | 0a77939 | 1,097,760,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/AjCompilerAdapter.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildConfig.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java ... | AspectJ |
449 | 74,238 | Bug 74238 Applet which uses cflow pointcut gets AccessControlException | When I used cflow pointcut for my applet, I couldn't launch the Applet. java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at SandAspect.ajc$preClinit(SandAspect.aj) at SandAspect.<clinit>(SandAspect.aj) at SandApplet.init(SandApplet.java) at sun.applet.AppletPanel.run(AppletPanel.java:353) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) ... | 2004-09-19 05:51:49 | 1,095,590,000 | resolved fixed | 6e155a6 | 1,097,740,000 | ajde/testdata/SecurityManagerTest/src/HelloWorld.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/CFlowCounter.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/CFlowStack.java | AspectJ |
450 | 72,157 | Bug 72157 declare soft can cause programs with invalid exception behaviour to be generated | Compiling the program below results in the constructor for the class SCE2 throwing Exception, which it is not declared to throw either in the source code or in the generated bytecode. If the 'declare soft' statement is removed, then the super() call in the SCE2 constructor is correctly reported as throwing an undeclare... | 2004-08-18 06:39:42 | 1,092,830,000 | resolved fixed | eca1429 | 1,094,650,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/problem/AjProblemReporter.java tests/bugs/ConvertToUnchecked.java tests/bugs/PR72157.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
451 | 73,433 | Bug 73433 AspectJ does not correctly support -cp | Discovered by Andy Brodie. -cp is a shorthand for -classpath supported by the JDT compiler. AspectJ does not correctly support -cp option. Look at this example: C:\aspectj1.2>ajc -inpath injar.jar -outjar outjar.jar -cp lib\aspectjrt.jar [error] can't find type org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint 1 error C:\aspectj1.2>ajc -inpa... | 2004-09-08 05:46:09 | 1,094,640,000 | resolved fixed | 8e4d898 | 1,094,640,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java | AspectJ |
452 | 73,334 | Bug 73334 Avoid clashes in the org.eclipse namespace by renaming our duplicates. | We have recently renamed our 'copy' of BCEL to use a different package prefix so that our version never clashes with another version that might be around on a users system. This enhancement is to do the same thing for our 'copy' of the org.eclipse.jdt code (in the shadows project). As part of packaging the shadows proj... | 2004-09-06 11:41:58 | 1,094,490,000 | resolved fixed | b133299 | 1,094,490,000 | ajde/src/org/aspectj/ajde/internal/CompilerAdapter.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/BuildConfigurationTests.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/ExtensionTests.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/AjdtCommand.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/sr... | AspectJ |
453 | 72,671 | Bug 72671 Bootclasspath specification for compiling is not possible | I have following bug running eclipse 3.0 and ajdt 1.1.12 I have following class: import java.io.FileNotFoundException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import org.w3c.dom.DOMConfiguration; import org.w3c.dom.DOMError; import org.w3c.dom.DOMErrorHandler; import org.w3c.dom.Document; import org.w3c.dom.DocumentFragment; ... | 2004-08-26 06:56:09 | 1,093,520,000 | resolved fixed | d1551bd | 1,094,480,000 | ajde/src/org/aspectj/ajde/internal/CompilerAdapter.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildConfig.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsr... | AspectJ |
454 | 72,528 | Bug 72528 around advice throws java.lang.VerifyError at runtime | I have an aspect that captures around() a pcd and returns an Object[], though the actual methods being instrumented might return any valid POJO array, i understand that AspectJ will take care of casting at assignment. I expected the following code to work properly, but at runtime i get a java.lang.VerifyError as shown ... | 2004-08-24 14:21:34 | 1,093,370,000 | resolved fixed | 27d204c | 1,094,220,000 | tests/bugs/ArrayCloning.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedTypeX.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelShadow.java | AspectJ |
455 | 46,298 | Bug 46298 Aspectj generate code does not de-compile cleanly. | null | 2003-11-07 14:40:53 | 1,068,230,000 | resolved fixed | 4921f0c | 1,094,050,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelShadow.java | AspectJ |
456 | 49,743 | Bug 49743 performance improvements for runtime library | I am heavily using the runtime signature information from thisJoinPoint.getSignature() and the toString() method of it. This causes heavy String operations each time the toString method is called. Would it be possible to cache the resulting string for example in MethodSignatureImpl and similar classes for other signatu... | 2004-01-08 17:37:54 | 1,073,600,000 | resolved fixed | 438e61c | 1,094,030,000 | runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/AdviceSignatureImpl.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/CatchClauseSignatureImpl.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/ConstructorSignatureImpl.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/Factory.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/FieldSignatureImpl.jav... | AspectJ |
457 | 72,699 | Bug 72699 Bogus error message: The abstract method ajc$pointcut$$tracingScope$a2 in type Tracing can only be defined by an abstract class | When attempting to compile the following aspect the resulting error message should say something like "The abstract method pointcut tracingScope in type Tracing can only be defined by an abstract aspect" public aspect Tracing { public abstract pointcut tracingScope(); } | 2004-08-26 11:46:30 | 1,093,540,000 | resolved fixed | 5e08765 | 1,093,610,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDeclaration.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/problem/AjProblemReporter.java tests/bugs/BogusMessage.java tests/bugs/BogusMessage2.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
458 | 72,150 | Bug 72150 AJC possible bug with static nested classes | null | 2004-08-18 03:27:01 | 1,092,810,000 | resolved fixed | b5e6307 | 1,093,600,000 | tests/bugs/java5/arrayCloning/A.java tests/bugs/java5/arrayCloning/C.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeX.java | AspectJ |
459 | 72,531 | Bug 72531 declare warning warns at wrong points | null | 2004-08-24 14:42:12 | 1,093,370,000 | resolved fixed | 82eae55 | 1,093,380,000 | tests/bugs/pr72531/de/rohith/HelloWorld.java tests/bugs/pr72531/de/rohith/HelloWorldAspect.java tests/bugs/pr72531/de/rohith/PrinterWorld.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/WildTypePattern.java weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/TypePatternTestCa... | AspectJ |
460 | 72,154 | Bug 72154 Support for simple dump file | When the compiler terminates abnormally (exception) or behaves unexpectedly (warning/error/abort) a simple dump of the compiler state should be produced to aid problem diagnosis. The content and conditions under which the dump is produced should be configurable by the user but the facility should be enabled by default ... | 2004-08-18 06:00:35 | 1,092,820,000 | resolved fixed | f503523 | 1,093,270,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/AjdtCommand.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajc/Main.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/DumpTestCase/sr... | AspectJ |
461 | 71,811 | Bug 71811 AJDoc: should be able to set encoding like javadoc | ajdoc doesn't support the -encoding -docencoding and -charset options of javadoc. Especially, it doesn't pass on the -encoding to ajc. If your project uses a source file encoding (e.g. UTF-8) differing form the platform standard, and some java identifiers use characters byond the standard ASCII range, you won't be able... | 2004-08-11 13:40:26 | 1,092,250,000 | resolved fixed | 5f80c8c | 1,092,960,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java | AspectJ |
462 | 49,657 | Bug 49657 Weaver results in rt error if affected base class not exposed | I was weaving a 3rd party library and wrote an aspect that should affect both a base class and a derived class, but inadvertently wove only the derived class. This resulted in the following error. I would like the weaver to catch this kind of error at weave (link) time, rather than creating code that results in a rt er... | 2004-01-07 17:27:35 | 1,073,510,000 | resolved fixed | dbe1024 | 1,092,930,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/partialHierarchy/sample/Base.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/partialHierarchy/sample/Derived.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/partialHierarchy/sample/Iface.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/batch/AjdtBatchTests.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/... | AspectJ |
463 | 71,723 | Bug 71723 Inconsistency in scoping of protected members in ITDs | When introducing new member functions to existing classes via inter-type declarations, the scoping rules that apply to the ITD bodies are the same as for the aspect - for example, private members of the target class cannot be accessed unless the aspect is privileged. Similarly, protected members of classes in different... | 2004-08-10 13:32:45 | 1,092,160,000 | resolved fixed | dfb15c1 | 1,092,830,000 | tests/bugs/pr71723/foo/Foo.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
464 | 71,076 | Bug 71076 Missing Javadoc comments that aren't missing | Reported in the AJDT newsgroup: Go to Preferences > Java > Compiler > Javadoc and set "Missing javadoc comments" to "Warning". You then get warnings against things you wouldn't expect, such as after advice. /** * A comment */ public aspect World { pointcut greeting() : execution(* Hello.sayHello(..)); /** * A comment *... | 2004-07-29 09:58:13 | 1,091,110,000 | resolved fixed | 5b90224 | 1,092,830,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/javadoc/World.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/batch/AjdtBatchTests.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/batch/JavadocTest.java | AspectJ |
465 | 62,642 | Bug 62642 proper handling of ExceptionInIntializer inside <clinit> in presence of after throwing advice | When a <clinit> of a class contains after throwing advice that may catch ExceptionInInitializer errors due to an embedded advice aspectOf() that fails, the ExceptionInIntializer error does not get properly reported. For the example below: public class Main { static int x = 13; int y; public Main() { y= 14; } public sta... | 2004-05-18 10:23:19 | 1,084,890,000 | resolved fixed | 84e4e53 | 1,092,750,000 | tests/bugs/pr62642.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelShadow.java | AspectJ |
466 | 70,241 | Bug 70241 outline view shows anonymous inner classes in different way than jdt outline | See screenshots. | 2004-07-16 11:41:14 | 1,089,990,000 | resolved fixed | a2469c7 | 1,092,740,000 | ajde/testdata/extensions/InnerClasses.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/ExtensionTests.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AsmHierarchyBuilder.java | AspectJ |
467 | 67,578 | Bug 67578 Privileged Aspect Access Problem Across Packages | From Irum Godil's aspectj-users posting: package a; public class ITD { private void returnNothing(Object a) { } } package b; import a.*; privileged aspect B { public void ITD.newFun() { returnNothing("a"); } } returns: C:\devel\test\priv\b\B.aj:8 error The method returnNothing(Object) from the type ITD is not visible r... | 2004-06-17 01:45:19 | 1,087,450,000 | resolved fixed | 6b1ef0f | 1,092,670,000 | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
468 | 71,878 | Bug 71878 Bad injar aspect name on Linux | If you checkout the "JarUsingProject" project from "org.eclipse.ajdt.test/manual testing" in the AJDT 1.1.12 tree, and look at the advised-by entries in the outline view and the context menu of the gutter annotation, on Windows you get "injar aspect: AbstractAspect.aj", but on Linux you get "injar aspect: C:\eclipse30A... | 2004-08-12 12:24:31 | 1,092,330,000 | resolved fixed | 2dfc738 | 1,092,410,000 | asm/src/org/aspectj/asm/internal/AspectJElementHierarchy.java | AspectJ |
469 | 61,374 | Bug 61374 Version the BCEL libraries to allow graceful failure when the wrong version is found. | null | 2004-05-07 08:45:15 | 1,083,930,000 | resolved fixed | 228fc8d | 1,092,300,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelAdvice.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelAttributes.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelCflowAccessVar.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelCflowStackFieldAdder.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelClassWeaver.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel... | AspectJ |
470 | 61,768 | Bug 61768 scope for intertype methods | /* According to the documentation, the scope rules for intertype method declarations are interpreted from the originating aspect. The only exceptions (I thought) are the use of "this" and "super" which refer to the target type. According to that interpretation, the program below is type correct, but ajc generates two e... | 2004-05-11 13:35:42 | 1,084,300,000 | resolved fixed | 8c5d743 | 1,092,240,000 | tests/bugs/oxford/PR61768.java tests/bugs/oxford/PR62475.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
471 | 54,421 | Bug 54421 Compile time declarations (warning and error) do not accept string concatenation (with +) | The following code does not compile because the message uses string concatenation (the + operator). public class WarningSample { public void method() {} public void anotherMethod() { this.method(); } } aspect WarningAspect { pointcut illegalCall(): call(* WarningSample.method()) && within(WarningSample); // the same th... | 2004-03-11 03:00:18 | 1,078,990,000 | resolved fixed | d43a391 | 1,092,230,000 | tests/bugs/decwStrings.java tests/bugs/decwStringsErroneous.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/PatternParser.java | AspectJ |
472 | 68,991 | Bug 68991 intertype initialisers should match field set pointcuts | /* initialisers of intertype fields should match field set pointcuts. In the example below, the output should be set field set(int C.n) set field set(int C.m) get field get(int C.n) set field set(int C.n) but the first field set (of C.n) is not picked up. */ aspect Aspect { private int C.n = 13; before() : get(* C.*) {... | 2004-06-30 07:51:21 | 1,088,600,000 | resolved fixed | 64183c3 | 1,092,230,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeFieldDeclaration.java tests/bugs/PR68991/Oxford.java tests/bugs/PR68991/Simple.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
473 | 65,319 | Bug 65319 ajc crashes when compiling the following program (binding this() and target()) | class Test { public static void main(String args[]) { new Test().method(); } public void method() { new Test2().method2(); } } class Test2 { public void method2() {} } aspect Plain { before(Test x): call(void *.* (..)) && (this(x) || target(x)) { } } | 2004-06-02 10:29:50 | 1,086,190,000 | resolved fixed | b75cd93 | 1,092,150,000 | tests/bugs/oxford/PR65319.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelAdvice.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ArgsPointcut.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ExposedState.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/ThisOrTargetPointcut.java | AspectJ |
474 | 53,981 | Bug 53981 proceed used as method name in around advice | Using a method named proceed(..) in around advice confuses the compiler (in at least the 2-3 ways shown below). True of the current tree (untested in 1.1.1). Workaround for now is to rename the method. ---- first problem: NPE in compiler java.lang.NullPointerException at org.aspectj.ajdt.internal.compiler.ast.MakeDecls... | 2004-03-06 22:43:04 | 1,078,630,000 | resolved fixed | 05dabd1 | 1,092,140,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/Proceed.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java | AspectJ |
475 | 59,208 | Bug 59208 Weaver fails in BCEL for large classes | null | 2004-04-20 05:23:13 | 1,082,450,000 | resolved fixed | 44a92e1 | 1,092,140,000 | tests/bugs/pr59208/Foo.java tests/bugs/pr59208/FooProducer.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tests.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/WeaverMessages.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/LazyClassGen.java | AspectJ |
476 | 67,592 | Bug 67592 value in the args[] array of thisjoinpoint can be changed by one advice decl and updated values seen in another advice decl | In ajc a use of thisJoinPoint corresponds to an object of type JoinPoint, where a JoinPoint object has four components, which can be retrieved using accessor methods. this getThis() target getTarget() args getArgs() staticJoinPoint getStaticPart() In the case of args, the object returned is an Object array. This means ... | 2004-06-17 04:06:53 | 1,087,460,000 | resolved fixed | f6436e3 | 1,092,060,000 | runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/JoinPointImpl.java runtime/testsrc/RuntimeModuleTests.java runtime/testsrc/org/aspectj/runtime/reflect/JoinPointImplTest.java | AspectJ |
477 | 71,377 | Bug 71377 Cannot advise private method call in around advice | Pointcuts should match call joint points in advice. However AspectJ does not match calls to _private_ methods in around advice. The same applies to get/set pointcuts for _private fields. This is probably because in the testcase below a call to "privateMethod()" in the body of the around advice is a call to an accessor ... | 2004-08-04 10:21:05 | 1,091,630,000 | resolved fixed | 851da68 | 1,092,050,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java tests/bugs/AroundAdviceJPs/FieldGetJoinPointsInAroundAdvice.java tests/bugs/AroundAdviceJPs/FieldJoinPointsInAroundAdvice.java tests/bugs/AroundAdviceJPs/JoinPointInAroundAdvice.java tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc121/Ajc121Tes... | AspectJ |
478 | 44,191 | Bug 44191 Need better error message for "can't find type" | I have experienced situations where IAJC outputs a message like this at the end of compilation. [iajc] can't find type org.xxx.SomeTest In my case this was one time highly confusing since I did not expect the class in question to be referred anywhere in the project (I have to date still not located the reference). For ... | 2003-10-04 20:23:15 | 1,065,310,000 | resolved fixed | 061395c | 1,091,800,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/EclipseSourceType.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedTypeX.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelAdvice.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelSh... | AspectJ |
479 | 42,573 | Bug 42573 .lst file entries not resolved relative to list file: {boot}classpath, extdirs, | My -classpath entry in a config/.lst file was resolved relative to the working directory rather than to the config/.lst file. BuildArgParser.java looks like this would also be true for bootclasspath and extdirs, but not for injars, aspectpath, or sourceroots. | 2003-09-04 18:40:22 | 1,062,720,000 | resolved fixed | 648c0f4 | 1,091,730,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParserTestCase.java util/src/org/aspectj/util/ConfigParser.java | AspectJ |
480 | 60,015 | Bug 60015 NPE, Incorrect XLint:unmatchedSuperTypeInCall warning | (This is an incomplete bug report -- sorry no time not to further isolate.) Running AJDT 1.1.6, I get dozens of these warnings: ---------- Warning does not match because declaring type is java.lang.Object, if match desired use target(st.ata.mc.exim.DatastoreReader) [Xlint:unmatchedSuperTypeInCall] Blah.aj project/src/p... | 2004-04-26 16:49:10 | 1,083,010,000 | resolved fixed | ef7885f | 1,091,540,000 | tests/bugs/IncorrectXlintOnInterface.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/KindedPointcut.java | AspectJ |
481 | 57,666 | Bug 57666 duplicate manifests cause resource-copying to gack | (Ah, the joy of build infrastructure...) Mostly self-explanatory trace, from a build Monday Apr 5, 2004 at 08:46:01 GMT: duplicate entry: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF duplicate entry: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputSt... | 2004-04-06 17:22:16 | 1,081,290,000 | resolved fixed | 2b8fa31 | 1,091,460,000 | ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/AjdeTests.java ajde/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajde/DuplicateManifestTest.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/batch/BcweaverJarMaker.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelW... | AspectJ |
482 | 67,774 | Bug 67774 Nullpointer-exception in pointcuts using withincode() clause | Hi, I am getting null-pointer-exceptions whenever I try to specify a pointcut with a "withincode(Signature)" clause. E.g.: public aspect DetectSystemOutErrorUsage { pointcut allSystemOutAndSystemErrAccesses(): (get(* System.out) || get(* System.err)) ; declare warning: allSystemOutAndSystemErrAccesses() && !adviceexecu... | 2004-06-18 04:54:37 | 1,087,550,000 | resolved fixed | 7f19ab4 | 1,091,450,000 | tests/bugs/WithincodeNPE01.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/bcel/BcelShadow.java | AspectJ |
483 | 70,773 | Bug 70773 AspectJ Error: ConncurrentModificationException thrown: null | In AspectJ 1.1.11 for Eclipse, build ID 1.2.0 (and also in the previous 1.1.10) on Eclipse version 3.0.0, build ID 200406351208: If I enable incremental compilation and make a change to a file (typing a space and deleting it, or editing a comment), I get a "ConncurrentModificationException thrown: null" error. | 2004-07-23 21:07:15 | 1,090,630,000 | resolved fixed | 9aed31d | 1,091,440,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/lookup/AjLookupEnvironment.java | AspectJ |
484 | 30,439 | Bug 30439 spurious "circular dependency" error | AspectJ Compiler 1.1beta4 This program: aspect Foo { pointcut p1(): execution(void f()) && cflow(execution(void f1())); pointcut p2(): execution(void f()) && cflow(execution(void f2())); before(): p1() { } after(): p1() { } before(): p2() { } after(): p2() { } } class A { void f1() { f(); } void f2() { f(); } void f() ... | 2003-01-28 16:20:10 | 1,043,790,000 | resolved fixed | 4feb835 | 1,091,110,000 | weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Advice.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Lint.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/NewConstructorTypeMunger.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedTypeX.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Shadow.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/WeaverMessages.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/WeaverS... | AspectJ |
485 | 61,536 | Bug 61536 Front-end bug, shouldn't allow patterns of the form foo.., should be foo..* | See following code: public class Test2 { public static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println("Hi"); } } aspect Aspect2 { // shouldn't one have to say, java..* instead of java.. in the following?? // Note that the first advice (incorrect one) passes the front-end, but does // not match, whereas the second one do... | 2004-05-09 12:50:40 | 1,084,120,000 | resolved fixed | 45bce91 | 1,091,100,000 | tests/bugs/EllipsesStar.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/PatternParser.java | AspectJ |
486 | 48,990 | Bug 48990 Special case if(false) to not require a dynamic test | FastMatch, the efficient pattern matching for pointcuts on the constant pool, is currrently only implemented for the within pointcut. I am planning to provide further oimplementations for other pointcuts by release 1.2. | 2003-12-17 06:29:52 | 1,071,660,000 | resolved fixed | 10c6de6 | 1,091,030,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/IfPseudoToken.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/IfPointcut.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/Pointcut.java | AspectJ |
487 | 64,331 | Bug 64331 java.lang.NullPointerException in WeaverMessageHandler class | null | 2004-05-27 09:58:21 | 1,085,670,000 | resolved fixed | 573741c | 1,091,030,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/WeaverMessageHandler.java tests/bugs/abstractITDs/A.java tests/bugs/abstractITDs/C.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/ResolvedTypeX.java | AspectJ |
488 | 58,681 | Bug 58681 -X should output available -X options | ajc should emit the available -X options on -help or -X request (the latter like java) to get more traffic and feedback on the experimental options. | 2004-04-15 12:19:15 | 1,082,050,000 | resolved fixed | 6ea8300 | 1,090,940,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/AjdtCommand.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/ajc/BuildArgParser.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajc/Main.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/EajcModuleTests.java org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajc/MainTest.java | AspectJ |
489 | 69,459 | Bug 69459 Hiding of Instance Methods by static methods | Using Introduction it is possible to hide instance methods by static methods. Example: class Super { public void m(){}; } class Sub {} aspect A { public static void Sub.m(){} } Acccording to the Java Language Specification this is not allowed. Is this behaviour desired ?? It is also possible to override static methods ... | 2004-07-07 09:10:42 | 1,089,210,000 | resolved fixed | b184363 | 1,090,940,000 | tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/Aspect1.java tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/Aspect2.java tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/IntertypeOverrides.java tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/IntertypeOverrides2.java tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/Subclass.java tests/bugs/intertypeOverrides/Superclass.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/Resol... | AspectJ |
490 | 53,999 | Bug 53999 "can't bind type" message has $ for . in type name for declare soft | cosmetic mistake in error message... expected: can't bind type name 'unknown.Error' actual: can't bind type name 'unknown$Error' (not sure why it would ever be munged with $) public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { test(); } static void test() { throw new Error("hello"); } static aspect A { declare... | 2004-03-07 22:07:22 | 1,078,720,000 | resolved fixed | 936459c | 1,090,920,000 | tests/bugs/Cosmetic.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/patterns/WildTypePattern.java | AspectJ |
491 | 70,619 | Bug 70619 compiler aborts with "conflicting dominates orders" with circular declare precedences | The following program causes ajc 1.2 to abort: public class Conflict { public static void main(String[] args) { } } aspect Conflict1 { declare precedence: Conflict1, Conflict2; before(): execution(* *(..)) { } } aspect Conflict2 { declare precedence: Conflict2, Conflict1; after(): execution(* *(..)) { } } | 2004-07-22 10:11:01 | 1,090,510,000 | resolved fixed | 75852d7 | 1,090,850,000 | tests/bugs/bug70619/Conflict.java tests/bugs/bug70619/Precedence.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java | AspectJ |
492 | 70,008 | Bug 70008 problem with ajdoc -public | null | 2004-07-14 07:16:55 | 1,089,800,000 | resolved fixed | 8dc0845 | 1,089,840,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/HtmlDecorator.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/foo/PkgVisibleClass.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/SpacewarTestCase.java | AspectJ |
493 | 69,011 | Bug 69011 ajdoc fails when using default package | null | 2004-06-30 10:22:51 | 1,088,610,000 | resolved fixed | 2cc4826 | 1,089,050,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/StubFileGenerator.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/InDefaultPackage.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java | AspectJ |
494 | 68,494 | Bug 68494 ajdoc does not support .aj files | In addition to accepting .java source files ajdoc needs to accept .aj files. | 2004-06-24 12:04:22 | 1,088,090,000 | resolved fixed | 3707411 | 1,088,120,000 | ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/StructureUtil.java ajdoc/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/StubFileGenerator.java ajdoc/testdata/coverage/foo/UseThisAspectForLinkCheck.java ajdoc/testsrc/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/CoverageTestCase.java | AspectJ |
495 | 61,411 | Bug 61411 AJDoc launch script on Windows can lose arguments | Using AspectJ 1.2rc1 on Windows XP This report highlights a problem that I've seen using ajdoc.bat on Windows but the issue applies equally to the ajc.bat and ajbrowser.bat files as well. The %ASPECTJ_HOME%\bin\ajdoc.bat file that users run to launch the ajdoc tool imposes a limit of only 9 command line arguments that ... | 2004-05-07 12:00:01 | 1,083,950,000 | resolved fixed | 39c3a3b | 1,085,760,000 | build/src/$installer$/org/aspectj/Main.java | AspectJ |
496 | 62,227 | Bug 62227 Load Time Weaving aborts on any kind of warning (declare/xlint) | The message handler in the weaving adapter for load time weaving says: public boolean handleMessage(IMessage message) throws AbortException { if (!isIgnoring(message.getKind())) { if (verbose) System.err.println(message.getMessage()); throw new AbortException(message); } return true; } This means for warnings it goes b... | 2004-05-14 05:34:16 | 1,084,530,000 | resolved fixed | 9ebfc84 | 1,084,540,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testsrc/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/batch/BcweaverJarMaker.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/WeavingURLClassLoader.java weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/tools/WeavingAdaptor.java weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/WeavingURLClassLoaderTest.java | AspectJ |
497 | 59,599 | Bug 59599 Race condition in test suite for incremental | On faster machines (my linux desktop, andy's home pc) several of the tests in ajcTests.xml are failing (suite attached). This appears to be due to a race condition between checking directory contents and waiting for the compilation to complete. I have an environment in which I can test candidate fixes if you can give m... | 2004-04-22 06:03:23 | 1,082,630,000 | resolved fixed | bd16033 | 1,083,750,000 | testing/src/org/aspectj/testing/harness/bridge/DirChanges.java | AspectJ |
498 | 59,909 | Bug 59909 CFlowStack removesThreads to late | Problem: The current implementation of CFlowStack (Version 1.1-till 1.2 rc1) stores all threads in a hashtable. These Threads are removes after several calls to the methods getThreadStack(). (In our cases >70 calls.) In our project, this cycle is much to long. We have soveral long running threads, which grap quite a lo... | 2004-04-26 05:40:05 | 1,082,970,000 | resolved fixed | 5f6b18b | 1,083,750,000 | runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/CFlowStack.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/cflowstack/ThreadStack.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/cflowstack/ThreadStackFactory.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/internal/cflowstack/ThreadStackFactoryImpl.java runtime/src/org/aspectj/runtime/intern... | AspectJ |
499 | 54,238 | Bug 54238 Restore build cancelling to Swing-based IDEs | Core compiler implementation changes have resulted in an incompatability with AJDE's build cancelling mechanism. Once the core canceling behavior stabilizes this needs to be restored. | 2004-03-09 22:52:18 | 1,078,890,000 | resolved fixed | a17b51b | 1,083,090,000 | ajbrowser/src/org/aspectj/tools/ajbrowser/BasicEditor.java | AspectJ |
500 | 59,596 | Bug 59596 Null pointer exception while weaving java.awt.Label | I tried to add an Aspect to java.awt.Label. I compile the aspect via: ajc -inpath /usr/local/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2/jre/lib/rt.jar Timestamp.java Here is the aspect Timestamp.java: aspect Timestamp { private int java.awt.Label._ts_read = 0; private int java.awt.Label._ts_write = 0; pointcut writeOp(): call (void java.awt.... | 2004-04-22 05:11:34 | 1,082,630,000 | resolved fixed | a97f3b6 | 1,082,740,000 | org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/EclipseAdapterUtils.java | AspectJ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.