charisreneec commited on
Commit
4643e37
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0c7ffff

Fixing references

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png +2 -2
  2. README.md +34 -4
OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png CHANGED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 2580037383b6f791d54ac3d66b136794b99dcd8b3aecf8a1cb459fc60565f658
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.49 MB

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 432578d3bfd8eb927840a86c570e5b78da9af3a5e01b451fed06532e7984ca64
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 74.7 kB
README.md CHANGED
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ tags:
13
  pretty_name: OpenPIR
14
  size_categories:
15
  - 1K<n<10K
 
 
 
 
 
16
  ---
17
 
18
  # OpenPIR: Open Predominant Instrument Recognition Dataset
@@ -109,13 +114,15 @@ OpenPIR was used to fine-tune a baseline PIR model (trained on IRMAS + MUMS solo
109
 
110
  ### Comparison with prior work
111
 
112
- Adding OpenPIR (≈3.2 hours of additional data) achieves competitive Micro and Macro F1 against systems that use substantially more augmentation data.
113
 
114
  ![SOTA comparison table](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png)
115
 
116
- ### Per-class performance vs. Han et al. baseline
117
 
118
- The chart below compares per-class Precision, Recall, and F1 for our best model against a reimplementation of Han et al.
 
 
119
 
120
  ![Per-class precision, recall, and F1 comparison](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_Han.png)
121
 
@@ -231,6 +238,29 @@ and OpenMic-2018:
231
 
232
  ---
233
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
234
  ## Contact
235
 
236
- Charis Cochran — [crc356 [at] drexel.edu]
 
 
13
  pretty_name: OpenPIR
14
  size_categories:
15
  - 1K<n<10K
16
+ configs:
17
+ - config_name: default
18
+ data_files:
19
+ - split: train
20
+ path: openpir_metadata.jsonl
21
  ---
22
 
23
  # OpenPIR: Open Predominant Instrument Recognition Dataset
 
114
 
115
  ### Comparison with prior work
116
 
117
+ Adding OpenPIR (≈3.2 hours of additional data) achieves competitive Micro and Macro F1 against systems that use substantially more augmentation data. Reference numbers correspond to the [References](#references) section below.
118
 
119
  ![SOTA comparison table](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png)
120
 
121
+ ¹ Yu et al. results reproduced from the original paper; evaluated on a different test split.
122
 
123
+ ### Per-class performance vs. Han et al. \[2\]
124
+
125
+ The chart below compares per-class Precision, Recall, and F1 for our best model (Model C) against a reimplementation of Han et al.
126
 
127
  ![Per-class precision, recall, and F1 comparison](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_Han.png)
128
 
 
238
 
239
  ---
240
 
241
+ ## References
242
+
243
+ References cited in the SOTA comparison table, renumbered [1]–[8]:
244
+
245
+ \[1\] J. J. Bosch, J. Janer, F. Fuhrmann, and P. Herrera. "A Comparison of Sound Segregation Techniques for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Musical Audio Signals." *ISMIR*, 2012.
246
+
247
+ \[2\] Y. Han, J. Kim, and K. Lee. "Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic Music." *IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process.*, 2017.
248
+
249
+ \[3\] J. Pons, O. Slizovskaia, R. Gong, E. Gómez, and X. Serra. "Timbre Analysis of Music Audio Signals with Convolutional Neural Networks." *EUSIPCO*, 2017.
250
+
251
+ \[4\] K. Avramidis, A. Kratimenos, C. Garoufis, and P. Maragos. "Deep Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Polyphonic Instrument Classification from Monophonic Raw Audio." *ICASSP*, 2021.
252
+
253
+ \[5\] D. Yu, H. Wang, P. Chen, and Z. Wei. "Predominant Instrument Recognition Based on Deep Neural Network with Auxiliary Classification." *IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process.* 28 (2020), pp. 852–861.
254
+
255
+ \[6\] A. Kratimenos, K. Avramidis, M. Kosta, and M. Kokiopoulou. "Augmentation Methods on Monophonic Audio for Instrument Classification in Polyphonic Music." *EUSIPCO*, 2021.
256
+
257
+ \[7\] L. C. Reghunath and R. Rajan. "Transformer-Based Ensemble Method for Multiple Predominant Instruments Recognition in Polyphonic Music." *EURASIP J. Audio, Speech, Music Process.* 2022.1 (2022), p. 11.
258
+
259
+ \[8\] L. Zhong, Z. Chen, W. Liang, J. Li, and C. Shi. "Exploring Isolated Musical Notes as Pre-Training Data for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic Music." *APSIPA ASC*, 2023, pp. 2312–2319.
260
+
261
+ ---
262
+
263
  ## Contact
264
 
265
+ Charis Cochran — crc356 [at] drexel [dot] edu
266
+ Drexel University / University of Pennsylvania