charisreneec commited on
Commit
e686221
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 866b36c

Uploading data and preview

Browse files
OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_Han.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: e2a9beefd8f7b1e6aa6f1e6b30a888d78e89b3720e7417fd1b33184c14505f9f
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 3.31 MB
OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 2580037383b6f791d54ac3d66b136794b99dcd8b3aecf8a1cb459fc60565f658
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.49 MB
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,237 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: apache-2.0
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - audio-classification
5
+ tags:
6
+ - audio
7
+ - music
8
+ - instrument-recognition
9
+ - predominant-instrument
10
+ - openmic
11
+ - irmas
12
+ - multi-label
13
+ pretty_name: OpenPIR
14
+ size_categories:
15
+ - 1K<n<10K
16
+ ---
17
+
18
+ # OpenPIR: Open Predominant Instrument Recognition Dataset
19
+
20
+ OpenPIR is a hand-labeled dataset for **predominant instrument recognition (PIR)** built from [OpenMic-2018](https://zenodo.org/record/1432913), a Creative Commons-licensed collection of 10-second music clips sourced from the [Free Music Archive](https://freemusicarchive.org/). It was introduced as part of the ICASSP 2026 paper:
21
+
22
+ > **Leveraging Diffusion U-Net Features for Predominant Instrument Recognition**
23
+ > Charis Cochran, Yeongheon Lee, Youngmoo Kim — Drexel University / University of Pennsylvania
24
+ > [IEEE Xplore](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11464738) · [Code & Demo](https://github.com/charisrenee/InstrumentRecognitionWithDiffusion)
25
+
26
+ ---
27
+
28
+ ## Dataset Summary
29
+
30
+ [IRMAS](https://www.upf.edu/web/mtg/irmas) is the standard training dataset for predominant instrument recognition, but it has two well-known limitations: relatively small size (6,705 clips), and studio-recorded solo performances that do not reflect the overlapping timbres of real-world music. OpenPIR addresses both by adding 1,228 annotated clips from OpenMic-2018 that are compatible with IRMAS labels — supplementing every instrument category and introducing genuine multi-label annotations.
31
+
32
+ ## Dataset Construction
33
+
34
+ OpenMic-2018 provides crowd-sourced instrument *presence/absence* scores (0–1) across 20 classes for ~20,000 clips from the Free Music Archive, but does not identify which instrument is **predominant**. To produce PIR-compatible labels, the following pipeline was applied:
35
+
36
+ 1. **Filter to IRMAS classes.** OpenMic-2018 annotations were filtered to retain only the 11 instrument classes shared with IRMAS.
37
+ 2. **Candidate selection.** From the filtered set, clips where exactly one instrument received a relevance score above **0.80** and all others fell below **0.40** were kept. This yielded ~4,500 candidates.
38
+ 3. **Manual labeling.** Each candidate was listened to and annotated for:
39
+ - Predominant instrument(s) — guitar was differentiated into *acoustic* vs. *electric* to match IRMAS classes
40
+ - IRMAS-equivalent genre (mapped from FMA tags)
41
+ - Drum/percussion presence (to match the IRMAS annotation convention)
42
+ 4. **Consistency check.** Only clips where the labeled instrument was predominant for the entire 10-second clip were retained. For clips where the instrument was predominant for only part of the clip, a start/stop time was selected manually, keeping the segment above 3 seconds.
43
+ 5. **Genre exclusion.** Clips from genres diverging strongly from IRMAS content (e.g., Drone, Glitch) were removed.
44
+
45
+ This process yielded **1,228 clips** across 11 instrument classes.
46
+
47
+ ---
48
+
49
+ ## Dataset Statistics
50
+
51
+ | | Count |
52
+ |---|---|
53
+ | **Total clips** | 1,228 |
54
+ | **Single-instrument clips** | 905 |
55
+ | **Multi-instrument clips** | 323 |
56
+ | **Instrument classes** | 11 (+ "other instrument") |
57
+ | **Genre classes** | 6 IRMAS genres + instrumental + soundtrack |
58
+
59
+ ### Instrument Distribution
60
+
61
+ Labels are multi-hot (a clip can have more than one predominant instrument).
62
+
63
+ | Instrument | IRMAS code | Label occurrences |
64
+ |---|---|---|
65
+ | Electric guitar | `gel` | 222 |
66
+ | Piano | `pia` | 195 |
67
+ | Voice / singing | `voi` | 188 |
68
+ | Cello | `cel` | 172 |
69
+ | Acoustic guitar | `gac` | 166 |
70
+ | Violin | `vio` | 142 |
71
+ | Organ | `org` | 130 |
72
+ | Saxophone | `sax` | 107 |
73
+ | Trumpet | `tru` | 72 |
74
+ | Other instrument | — | 69 |
75
+ | Flute | `flu` | 68 |
76
+ | Clarinet | `cla` | 40 |
77
+
78
+ *"Other instrument" is used for clips whose predominant instrument falls outside the 11 IRMAS classes (e.g., synthesizer, banjo, mandolin). These clips are included in the dataset but excluded from IRMAS-code evaluation.*
79
+
80
+ ### Genre Distribution
81
+
82
+ Genre labels are mapped to the IRMAS genre taxonomy.
83
+
84
+ | Genre | IRMAS code | Clips |
85
+ |---|---|---|
86
+ | Instrumental / no clear genre | `instrumental` | 361 |
87
+ | Pop / rock | `pop_roc` | 328 |
88
+ | Country / folk | `cou_fol` | 300 |
89
+ | Classical | `cla` | 280 |
90
+ | Jazz / blues | `jaz_blu` | 168 |
91
+ | Soundtrack / score | `soundtrack` | 127 |
92
+ | Latin / soul | `lat_sou` | 65 |
93
+ | Not available | `NA` | 83 |
94
+
95
+ *Genre counts exceed 1,228 because a small number of clips carry two genre labels. The `NA` category covers clips whose FMA genre tags could not be reliably mapped.*
96
+
97
+ ---
98
+
99
+ ## Experimental Results
100
+
101
+ OpenPIR was used to fine-tune a baseline PIR model (trained on IRMAS + MUMS solo recordings) and measure the effect on held-out evaluation performance. Four model variants were compared:
102
+
103
+ | Model | Training procedure |
104
+ |---|---|
105
+ | **Baseline** | Trained on IRMAS + MUMS solos, 400 epochs |
106
+ | **Model A** | Baseline fine-tuned 100 epochs on IRMAS only |
107
+ | **Model B** | Baseline fine-tuned 100 epochs on IRMAS + OpenPIR |
108
+ | **Model C** | Sequential fine-tune: B → 100 more epochs on IRMAS + OpenPIR |
109
+
110
+ ### Comparison with prior work
111
+
112
+ Adding OpenPIR (≈3.2 hours of additional data) achieves competitive Micro and Macro F1 against systems that use substantially more augmentation data.
113
+
114
+ ![SOTA comparison table](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_SOTA.png)
115
+
116
+ ### Per-class performance vs. Han et al. baseline
117
+
118
+ The chart below compares per-class Precision, Recall, and F1 for our best model against a reimplementation of Han et al.
119
+
120
+ ![Per-class precision, recall, and F1 comparison](OpenPIR_PerformanceStat_Han.png)
121
+
122
+ ---
123
+
124
+ ## Data Fields
125
+
126
+ The dataset is distributed as `openpir_metadata.jsonl`. Each line is a JSON object with the following fields:
127
+
128
+ | Field | Type | Description |
129
+ |---|---|---|
130
+ | `sample_key` | `string` | OpenMic-2018 sample identifier (`{track_id}_{start_frame}`) |
131
+ | `filepath` | `string` | Relative path to the audio file within the OpenMic-2018 archive |
132
+ | `artist` | `string` | Artist name from FMA metadata |
133
+ | `title` | `string` | Track title from FMA metadata |
134
+ | `album` | `string` | Album name from FMA metadata |
135
+ | `instrument` | `list[string]` | Predominant instrument(s), full English names (e.g. `"acoustic guitar"`) |
136
+ | `openmic_genres` | `list[string]` | Original FMA genre tags carried through from OpenMic-2018 |
137
+ | `genre` | `list[string]` | Genre(s) mapped to IRMAS taxonomy codes |
138
+ | `tags` | `list[string]` | Additional free-form tags (may be empty) |
139
+
140
+ ---
141
+
142
+ ## How to Use
143
+
144
+ ### Load the metadata
145
+
146
+ ```python
147
+ from datasets import load_dataset
148
+
149
+ ds = load_dataset("charisreneec/OpenPIR", split="train")
150
+ print(ds[0])
151
+ ```
152
+
153
+ ### Map labels to IRMAS codes
154
+
155
+ ```python
156
+ INSTRUMENT_TO_IRMAS = {
157
+ "cello": "cel",
158
+ "clarinet": "cla",
159
+ "flute": "flu",
160
+ "acoustic guitar": "gac",
161
+ "electric guitar": "gel",
162
+ "organ": "org",
163
+ "piano": "pia",
164
+ "saxophone": "sax",
165
+ "trumpet": "tru",
166
+ "violin": "vio",
167
+ "voice": "voi",
168
+ }
169
+
170
+ def get_irmas_labels(example):
171
+ return [INSTRUMENT_TO_IRMAS[i] for i in example["instrument"] if i in INSTRUMENT_TO_IRMAS]
172
+ ```
173
+
174
+ ### Load audio (requires OpenMic-2018)
175
+
176
+ The audio files are not redistributed here because they originate from OpenMic-2018 (CC BY 4.0, Free Music Archive). Download the archive from Zenodo and point your loader at it:
177
+
178
+ ```python
179
+ import json, soundfile as sf
180
+ from pathlib import Path
181
+
182
+ openmic_root = Path("/path/to/openmic-2018") # set to your local copy
183
+
184
+ with open("openpir_metadata.jsonl") as f:
185
+ records = [json.loads(line) for line in f]
186
+
187
+ for record in records:
188
+ audio_path = openmic_root / record["filepath"]
189
+ audio, sr = sf.read(audio_path)
190
+ labels = record["instrument"]
191
+ # ... your processing here
192
+ ```
193
+
194
+ ---
195
+
196
+ ## Source Data & License
197
+
198
+ OpenPIR labels are released under **CC BY 4.0**.
199
+
200
+ The underlying audio clips come from **OpenMic-2018**, which is itself derived from the **Free Music Archive** and also released under CC BY 4.0. If you use OpenPIR, you must also comply with the OpenMic-2018 license terms:
201
+
202
+ - OpenMic-2018: Humphrey et al., "OpenMIC-2018: An Open Data-set for Multiple Instrument Recognition," *ISMIR 2018*. [Zenodo record](https://zenodo.org/record/1432913)
203
+ - Free Music Archive: [freemusicarchive.org](https://freemusicarchive.org/)
204
+
205
+ ---
206
+
207
+ ## Citation
208
+
209
+ If you use OpenPIR in your work, please cite:
210
+
211
+ ```bibtex
212
+ @inproceedings{cochran2026openpir,
213
+ title = {Leveraging Diffusion U-Net Features for Predominant Instrument Recognition},
214
+ author = {Cochran, Charis and Lee, Yeongheon and Kim, Youngmoo},
215
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)},
216
+ year = {2026},
217
+ url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11464738}
218
+ }
219
+ ```
220
+
221
+ and OpenMic-2018:
222
+
223
+ ```bibtex
224
+ @inproceedings{humphrey2018openmic,
225
+ title = {{OpenMIC-2018}: An Open Data-set for Multiple Instrument Recognition},
226
+ author = {Humphrey, Eric J. and Durand, Simon and McFee, Brian},
227
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR)},
228
+ year = {2018}
229
+ }
230
+ ```
231
+
232
+ ---
233
+
234
+ ## Contact
235
+
236
+ Charis Cochran — [charisreneec@gmail.com](mailto:charisreneec@gmail.com)
237
+ Drexel University / University of Pennsylvania
openpir_metadata.jsonl ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff