step int64 50k 500k | curriculum_stage int64 2 2 | mean_score float64 0 3.5 | max_score float64 0 14 | mean_shots float64 200 200 | mean_efficiency float64 0 0.02 | mean_foul_rate float64 0.96 1 | episodes int64 16 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50,000 | 2 | 1.9375 | 10 | 200 | 0.009688 | 0.986563 | 16 |
100,000 | 2 | 0.0625 | 1 | 200 | 0.000313 | 0.996563 | 16 |
150,000 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 200 | 0.0025 | 0.9825 | 16 |
200,000 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0.999375 | 16 |
250,000 | 2 | 0.375 | 3 | 200 | 0.001875 | 0.989688 | 16 |
300,000 | 2 | 3.5 | 14 | 200 | 0.0175 | 0.968125 | 16 |
350,000 | 2 | 0.1875 | 1 | 200 | 0.000938 | 0.982813 | 16 |
400,000 | 2 | 1.375 | 6 | 200 | 0.006875 | 0.976875 | 16 |
450,000 | 2 | 2.8125 | 9 | 200 | 0.014063 | 0.964062 | 16 |
500,000 | 2 | 1.75 | 10 | 200 | 0.00875 | 0.979688 | 16 |
snooker-testbed-phase4f-discrete-v1
Phase 4F BREAKTHROUGH RUN. After 13 prior runs all hit a 98% foul-rate plateau, discretizing the action space (continuous Box[-1,1]^4 → MultiDiscrete([36 phi, 8 force, 5 a-spin, 5 b-spin]) = 7200 actions) finally broke through. Job 7308075 on torch h200, 19m53s wall, ran 2026-04-27 13:16-13:36 UTC. RESULTS (vs prior best run Phase 4G with augmented obs only): - mean over 10 evals: 1.25 (vs 4G 0.76, 4e 0.64) — 2× improvement - peak score: 3.50 at step 300k (vs 4G 1.69, 4e 2.25 single spike) - max single-ep score: 14 (vs 4G's 14, 4e's 12) - foul rate broke 97% TWICE (96.8% at step 300k, 96.4% at step 450k) — FIRST time below 97% in any run - score > 2.0 at TWO evals (3.50, 2.81) — sustained performance, not a spike Hypothesis confirmed: 4D continuous Gaussian was the bottleneck. Categorical PPO head directly upweights bins that score well, skipping the Gaussian-fit-over-chaotic-foul-space problem. Augmented obs (from Phase 4G) preserved in the recipe.
Dataset Info
- Rows: 10
- Columns: 8
Columns
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| step | Value('int64') | Global PPO timestep |
| curriculum_stage | Value('int64') | No description provided |
| mean_score | Value('float64') | Mean over 16 eps. Peaks 3.50 at step 300k AND 2.81 at step 450k — sustained > 2.0 performance, first run to do so. |
| max_score | Value('float64') | Best single-ep score (14 at step 300k) |
| mean_shots | Value('float64') | No description provided |
| mean_efficiency | Value('float64') | No description provided |
| mean_foul_rate | Value('float64') | Hit 96.4% at step 450k — FIRST run to break below 97%. |
| episodes | Value('int64') | No description provided |
Generation Parameters
{
"script_name": "sbatch/train_sim.sbatch (Phase 4F \u2014 discrete action space)",
"model": "stable-baselines3 PPO, MlpPolicy net_arch=[256,256], MultiDiscrete([36,8,5,5])",
"description": "Phase 4F BREAKTHROUGH RUN. After 13 prior runs all hit a 98% foul-rate plateau, discretizing the action space (continuous Box[-1,1]^4 \u2192 MultiDiscrete([36 phi, 8 force, 5 a-spin, 5 b-spin]) = 7200 actions) finally broke through. Job 7308075 on torch h200, 19m53s wall, ran 2026-04-27 13:16-13:36 UTC. RESULTS (vs prior best run Phase 4G with augmented obs only): - mean over 10 evals: 1.25 (vs 4G 0.76, 4e 0.64) \u2014 2\u00d7 improvement - peak score: 3.50 at step 300k (vs 4G 1.69, 4e 2.25 single spike) - max single-ep score: 14 (vs 4G's 14, 4e's 12) - foul rate broke 97% TWICE (96.8% at step 300k, 96.4% at step 450k) \u2014 FIRST time below 97% in any run - score > 2.0 at TWO evals (3.50, 2.81) \u2014 sustained performance, not a spike Hypothesis confirmed: 4D continuous Gaussian was the bottleneck. Categorical PPO head directly upweights bins that score well, skipping the Gaussian-fit-over-chaotic-foul-space problem. Augmented obs (from Phase 4G) preserved in the recipe.",
"hyperparameters": {
"algorithm": "PPO",
"total_timesteps": 500000,
"n_envs": 8,
"n_steps": 512,
"batch_size": 2048,
"ent_coef": 0.01,
"learning_rate": 0.0003,
"gamma": 0.99,
"discrete_actions": true,
"discrete_phi_bins": 36,
"discrete_force_bins": 8,
"discrete_spin_bins": 5,
"obs_dim": 79,
"obs_augmentation": "best-aim sin/cos, dist_target, dist_pocket, alignment, has_target",
"code_version": "2026-04-27-phase4f-discrete",
"commit": "76cf578"
},
"input_datasets": [],
"experiment_name": "snooker-testbed",
"job_id": "torch:7308075",
"cluster": "torch",
"artifact_status": "final",
"canary": true
}
Experiment Documentation
For complete experiment details, see https://github.com/aditijc/snooker-testbed
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("aditijc/snooker-testbed-phase4f-discrete-v1", split="train")
print(f"Loaded {len(dataset)} rows")
- Downloads last month
- 59